Does Robin Hood deserve all the negative hype it is receiving? I am going to answer both yes and no. I love what the writers tried by taking real history and mixing it in with the myth. I did see some inconsistencies, but I don’t want put these down because I don’t want to cross check them. I will leave that to some historian or writer who is being paid to write their criticism. However, to tie the film in with some real history the had to mess up the Robin Hood myth as we know it.
I was fine with this as well. The writers did an outstanding job. I was angry with how Clash of the Titan went, but not with this one.
My biggest complaints, at times Robin Hood is boring. Parts of the story seem like a copout. Not only that, but the climax of the movie ruins the film; which goes something like this. England unites to repel an invasion from Philip XIV of France. Suddenly Marion runs into the battlefield and goes after the villain and about dies. Robin see her fall into the ocean and the movie goes into one of those slow motion scenes, “Nooo!”. Robin rushes to save her and succeeds. He finds her alive and the make out with a thousand men slaughtering one another. It was just yuck. Bad taste for the scene.
Robin Hood. I like they direction the writers tried to go, but someone really screws the thing up. Ridley Scott, perhaps? Does Robin Hood deserve the negative reviews it is receiving? Watch the film and you decide.